Britney Spears: Life in Review

by Sandy Miller

Britney Spears is definitely a high-profile mass media target. Beautiful and entertaining, pop star Britney Spears gets much coverage for her antics, attitudes, actions, and values. But what many people wonder about is this: which acts are intentional as contributions to her publicity campaigns and which are unintended leaks to the public?

"Oops, I did it again. I played with your heart" smirks the cheeky, sexy Spears. Is this really an innocent faux pas? With the debut and platinum catapult to success of her first album, Baby One More Time, Spears was the school girl with sex appeal and the singing/dancing star at the top of the pop charts. She was innocent, cute, but Lolita-esque at best. So the media rag information begins or, that is, the rumors take up housing in her high-profile life: she's only 17 (read: still a minor), and she has had breast implants. The publicity has begun!

Next the media reports, with only three years and many best-sellers and awards to her credit, Britney drops the maulable baby doll persona, drops a few more yards of material, and picks up a giant albino snake to writhe about with for her performance at the 2001 MTV Video Music Awards, and picks up slack from PETA.

Next, a Razzie Award for worst actress ever. Then Britney's painful separation from Justin Timberlake exposes the possibility of infidelity on her part. Britney opens a restaurant; it closes a year later. Britney goes into hiding for a bit, fueling fires of chat about her loss of pop princess status. Britney then tongues Madonna, and sparks a resuscitation of media coverage.

Time for Love and Marriage

Britney then marries a boy from her childhood years, the marriage getting annulled three days later. Two months later, she is engaged to Kevin Federline, a divorced father of two at 26 years old. Within six months, Spears is married, has three smash (and a few not so) hits, a moderately successful fragrance, and a crashing five-episode reality show failure. Britney also gives birth to baby Sean Preston Federline.

And though Britney has purportedly an Original Doll album in the making, clearly suggesting her awareness that her Lolita image is what works or worked best, it is that image that has incurred the disdain of many. On that list is Governor Robert Ehrlich's wife, First Lady Kendel, who would "like to shoot Britney Spears;" and Britney is questioned as a fit role model. She is likened to Madonna though she is far less the savvy and knowledgeable, and cannot claim anywhere near the struggles and creative challenges Madonna has earned the right to claim as her own.

So, consider the latest kinds of coverage on Britney Spears. A star-search online usually yields a Wikipedia entry on page one of Google but when you search for Britney Spears, the wiki entry shows up half way down page two. Hmmm. Next, in the latest edition of Us Weekly, which is always generous with Jessica Simpson shots or plastered with Angelina Jolie articles and features, the items that appear on Brit are:

1) a photo of her in a food-stained dress, which she wore, Us said, on March 14

2) a photo of her coming out of a gas station bathroom sans shoes, August 04 [also shown in earlier grocery store rags, btw]

3) a photo of her standing on July 04 on a Ritz-Carlton balcony fondling her mate Kevin Federline's crotch

4) a one-paragraph dossier of sorts, with a three quarter page photo of Spears walking with Federline with a discussion of her wanting Kevin back if he would only quit smoking cigarettes AND pot for the sake of the baby.

The Mommy Side is Where?

But where are the shots of the baby? In that same issue, motherhood and father hood is a predominant theme. A three-paged bit is done on Angelina Jolie, featuring a full-page and an additional inset photo of Jolie with newly adopted Zahara. There are also these: centerfold Mommy & Me photographs with Liv Tyler, Kate Moss, and Denise Richards hanging out with their kids. And in 'The Stars are Just Like Us' section, we can even see monumental stars like the great Dustin Hoffman taking his son to a NY Nicks game.

So is lack of baby photos evidence that protection of the baby is a major concern? Is it to protect and endure Britney's teeny-bopper image? Is it to protect the hearts of the wishful thinking fans who fantasize being with Britney without baby or happily married mate in tow? We will never know, as the line between popularity and publicity, between candid, serendipitous coverage and intentional stagings, is paper thin.

The popularity stunts of pop diva Janet Jackson are either passed off as bloopers or a feigned secret. Britney Spears seems to be a relatively innocuous target who doesn't use much more than a mock marriage or a crotch-grab to sell covers. But then again, maybe she has us all fooled.